The United States and China are locked in a standoff with no resolution in sight. The U.S. wants to reshore manufacturing, and China wants to sell its manufactured products into the American market. It will take a creative solution to overcome this impasse, but it’s very possible.
President Trump himself has already previewed what a winning formula could look like. During his 2024 campaign, he repeatedly pledged to lure other countries’ factories to the United States. At a rally in Michigan, he said: “China has to build plants here and hire our workers. When I’m back in the White House, the way they will sell their product in America is to build it in America. They have to build it in America, and they have to use you people to build it.”
When China began embracing a market economy in the 1970s, its leaders made a similar demand to American companies. In order to get access to the Chinese market, American firms would have to manufacture in China, hire Chinese workers and teach the Chinese the underlying technology. But times have changed. China is no longer America’s pupil. When it comes to automobile and battery manufacturing, Chinese companies are years ahead of their American competition. It’s time for us to learn from them.
Gotion Inc., an advanced Chinese battery manufacturer, is currently building two plants in the United States. The Gotion plants in Michigan and Illinois together will employ 5,000 American workers and also train American engineers in the latest lithium battery technology. CATL, another Chinese battery company, is looking to build factories in partnership with American automakers. Their proposed factory in Michigan, a joint venture with Ford, would employ 2,500 Americans.
These companies are attempting to build here because they want access to the U.S. market. By building in the U.S., they can avoid tariffs and more easily sell their batteries to American companies. In return, the U.S. gets good-paying jobs, the best batteries in the world and a more advanced manufacturing sector.
But instead of embracing this as a victory, Republicans have brutally attacked both Gotion and CATL because they’re Chinese. For them, every company from China is a national security threat, even if there’s no specific evidence against them. According to the hawks, merely being Chinese-owned means the company is part of a covert operation directed by the Chinese government. Evidence to the contrary is simply ignored.
In Gotion’s case, they’re a global company whose largest shareholder is Volkswagen; the U.S. operations are run by American executives; and the U.S. plants will be staffed by American workers. In CATL’s case, it won’t own the U.S. plant it helps build, but instead will be licensing technology to Ford, which will own the plant. But when it comes to China, such inconvenient facts are thrown out the window because politicians need to score political points.
The China bashing has become so prevalent that Trump has had to clarify his position. At a recent Cabinet meeting, Trump said that he welcomes Chinese investment in the United States, and that he doesn’t understand why some people have the impression that he doesn’t. Of course, people have that impression because his underlings have been working overtime to prevent Chinese companies from investing here. Not only has Trump not slapped them down, but also he contradicted his own position by signing an executive order that makes it harder for the U.S. and China to invest in each other.
If this current trajectory continues, there won’t be more Gotions or CATLs announcing investments in America. Trump needs to make it clear that victory in the trade war includes Chinese manufacturers setting up shop here. If he doesn’t, his staff may continue to sabotage what could be openings to defuse tensions with China.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has wisely called for an economic rebalancing with China. That will require adopting a rational approach, not one based on paranoia. It’s time to turn this standoff into a victory.
James Bacon was a special assistant to the president during the first Trump administration.
Insights
L.A. Times Insights delivers AI-generated analysis on Voices content to offer all points of view. Insights does not appear on any news articles.
Viewpoint
Perspectives
The following AI-generated content is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Times editorial staff does not create or edit the content.
Ideas expressed in the piece
- The article argues that Chinese investments in U.S. manufacturing, such as Gotion Inc. and CATL’s battery plants, provide economic benefits, including job creation, technology transfer, and access to advanced products, while helping Chinese companies avoid tariffs[^1].
- It criticizes Republican opposition to these investments as driven by unfounded national security concerns, dismissing evidence that Gotion is majority-owned by Volkswagen and employs U.S. workers, or that CATL’s Michigan plant would be owned by Ford[^1].
- The author highlights President Trump’s public support for Chinese investment while noting contradictions in his administration’s actions, such as executive orders restricting bilateral investment[^1].
- The piece calls for a “rational approach” to U.S.-China economic relations, emphasizing mutual gains over “paranoia” and framing Chinese manufacturing presence as a potential victory in trade negotiations[^1].
Different views on the topic
- Critics argue that Chinese investment risks technology leakage and covert influence, with the U.S. maintaining tariffs and trade restrictions to protect strategic industries like semiconductors and critical minerals, as seen in recent bilateral agreements[4].
- The GOP’s skepticism aligns with broader U.S. efforts to rebalance economic ties, reflected in the temporary 90-day tariff reduction to 10%, which includes safeguards to revert to higher rates if China violates terms[2][3][4].
- National security hawks emphasize minimizing dependency on Chinese supply chains, particularly in sectors like electric vehicles, where U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods remain at 20%-30% despite recent negotiations[4].
- The Trump administration’s mixed signals—publicly welcoming investment while tightening rules—reflect ongoing tensions between economic pragmatism and strategic caution, a theme echoed in Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s push for “economic rebalancing”[1][3].
[^1]: Article by James Bacon
[2]: China Briefing, May 14, 2025
[3]: Gibson Dunn, May 15, 2025
[4]: HK Law, May 20, 2025